[194.90.9.21])
by mill.venus.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29092
for <moq_focus@moq.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:07:05 GMT
Received: from marder ([62.0.180.244]) by mxout2.netvision.net.il
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built Sep 5 2001))
with SMTP id <0GNL00EHHYRSHW@mxout2.netvision.net.il> for moq_focus@moq.org;
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:07:05 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:40:09 +0200
From: "Jonathan B. Marder" <jonathan.marder@newmail.net>
Subject: MF lacks dynamism
To: moq_focus@moq.org
Message-id: <013b01c17986$2cff6c40$5fb6003e@marder>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <200111290531.FAA07544@mill.venus.co.uk>
Hi all,
KEITH
> We appear to be having an acute attack of chronic apathy. I deduce this
from
> having received only 1 topic suggestion for next month (and only 1 post
for
> this last month, which did not make it to the list for various reasons).
> Since it's pointless to have a vote when there's only once choice, I will
> hold off on the call for votes for a day and offer the following
alternative
> meta-topic:
> ...
> What should we do to revitalize the MOQ_Focus mailing list?
Actually, it might be more useful to discuss WHY this forum is virtually
dead while the unmoderated sister list is thriving - I believe that it has a
lot to do with the whole relationship between dynamic and static. I sort of
proposed this a discussion topic some months ago, but nobody picked up on
it.
IMHO, the division into two lists has been a failure.
I would prefer that we try and get back to a single forum, as the Lila Squad
once was.
Jonathan
Sender: owner-moq_focus@venus.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: moq_focus@moq.org
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:33 BST