Blade, Wim, Christopher
My position is this:
I think anyone, including me, should be allowed to copy, edit and publish anyone else’s work under any name without asking them, informing them or thanking them. UNLESS that work happens to have been originated by ME in which case everyone must treat the writing as sacred and nobody is allowed to touch it even if I post it in a forum SPECIFICALLY INTENDED for group editing.
That clear?
3WD
--- "Wim Nusselder" <wim.nusselder@antenna.nl> wrote:
>Dear Killer Blade,
>
>I don't think discussing rights to edit and copy each others'
>texts are 'idiotic fights over nothing at all'. They are
>essential if we consider using wiki-technology. I agree that the
>tone of the discussion can be improved, though, your tone also...
>
>(You wrote 25/1 3:14:42 -0800:
>'And here we go again!! It’s silly Season folks! What is it with
>this place? It’s like you deliberately go out of your way to
>avoid any sensible discussion preferring instead to pick idiotic
>fights over nothing at all.'
>This did not impress me as an invitation to sensible discussion,
>either.)
>
>What are your ideas about rights to edit and copy each others'
>texts?
>
>With friendly greetings,
>
>Wim
>
>
>
>MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
_____________________________________________________________
**Short Advert**
Web Hosting & Domain Names
http://www.smackhosting.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:34 BST