Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS AND OPINION REMINDER

From: Amilcar Kabral (amilcarkabral@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 30 2004 - 03:22:02 GMT

  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS AND OPINION REMINDER"

    Honestly, i'm really not being facetious. But Wim, is this your offering for
    a topic? If not, i think you should ask it as your suggestion (whether we'll
    acutally 'obey' the findings/opinions is another topic i guess -hehe). If so
    it has my vote.

    But my own suggestion:

    Is the romantic/classic split from the ZMM model (classic/romantic) really
    separate from the MoQ? Or are these just different ways of cutting up the
    same pie?

    For example, both romantic and classic mindsets have dynamic (new
    revolutions, innovations and discoveries) and static (technical and logical
    'conclusions', and masters without new insights) polarities. Also, each
    mindset deals with reality and perception just as the MoQ hierarchy does. So
    in what way does the MoQ go beyond, incorporate and/or dismantle the
    romantic/classic division? Or, How does the MoQ and ZMM model relate to each
    other in action/method?

    I think that the MoQ is a different dimensional view of the same territory.
    If we looked at the hierarchy (inorganic . . . intellectual) in an up-down
    manner and the static-dynamic as left-right columns, then we can use the
    romatic-classic split in the dimension of depth.

    Amilcar

    Dance 'til your knees hurt
    Giggle 'til you're gone
    Love with abandon
    Do

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
    MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 30 2004 - 04:15:15 GMT