Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2005 - 17:45:17 GMT

Next message: Matt poot: "MF TOPIC SUGGESTION 2005"

Previous message: Jaap Karssenberg: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Maybe in reply to: Horse: "MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Next in thread: Hugo Masse: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"In the MOQ feeling corresponds to biological quality." (Pirsig in the
Copleston annotations).

I'd like to suggest we spend a bit of time trying to work out what "feeling"
is, as referred to here, whether it's the same as "sensation" or "emotion",
and if so, whether this analysis stands up to scrutiny in the light of
contemporary understandings in the philosophy of mind and neuroscience.

Sam

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html

Next message: Matt poot: "MF TOPIC SUGGESTION 2005"
Previous message: Jaap Karssenberg: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Maybe in reply to: Horse: "MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Next in thread: Hugo Masse: "Re: MF CALL FOR TOPICS - FEB 2K5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 03 2005 - 01:01:14 GMT