Re: MF Discussion Topic for May 2005 - individual worth

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue May 24 2005 - 22:44:55 BST

  • Next message: Erin: "Re: MF Discussion Topic for May 2005 - individual worth"

    Hello MFers,

    I was just looking at these two representations and thinking about the
    difference between them. In the second diagram are you saying that the DQ
    at L1 is different from the DQ at L2 (i.e. also hierarchical)?
    One thing I don't like about the second diagram is that it is "slicing"
    DQ -- I like the contrast of the first---the divided/undivided
    One thing I do like about the second diagram is that it shows the
    pervasiveness of DQ.

    I am convinced that the static levels are a hierarchy but I am less
    convinced that a hierarchical representation is the best representation of
    DQ. Is a "dynamic" moment a breaking away from a hiearchy? or latching to a
    larger/better hiearchy?

    For example consider this quote by R. Wilson....

    " I suspect that such intelligence acts via feedback from all parts to all
    parts and without centralized sovereignity, like Internet; and that it does
    not function hierarchically."

    Thanks,
    Erin

     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
    MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 27 2005 - 11:17:52 BST