Martin Striz (striz1@MARSHALL.EDU)
Thu, 6 Nov 1997 06:18:10 +0100
Bodvar,
Well, my intention was to compare what the MOQ would reveal vs. current
theories. So the first two layers of static values (going backwards in
time of course) could be compared to historical accounts. Before that,
we leave history and delve into science theories and religious myths,
what else is there? So I gave a typical abiogenetical evolutionary
account (although I like Dawkins' crystal theory better than the organic
soup, personally) for the evolution of biological values. Of course,
there are others (as I just showed w/ the crystal theory). And going to
the last step, I reviewed the two dominant theories: the big bang and
divine creation. My point was that on that final step, I didn't gain
anything by applying MOQ to either account. I don't know what was so
wrong with using those accounts, though.
Martin
-- post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:13 CEST