Magnus Berg (MagnusB@DataVis.se)
Sun, 9 Nov 1997 20:18:43 +0100
Hi Doug, quite a post, I'll just pick a few parts.
Doug wrote:
>This brings us to gist: I think MoQ and QM imply and aver that there
>are interrelations and interactions at all levels via DQ all the time,
>but at different rates and differing amounts.
I agree.
> The grouping of MoQ's
>four SPoVs and the patterns we choose to attribute each level are for
>sake of modeling MoQ and communicating it to other humans. The grouping
>is Earth-chauvinistic and homo-centric.
I hope you didn't expect me to agree with this. ;-)
I agree that the patterns most choose to attribute each level are
"Earth-
chauvinistic and homo-centric". Good examples are your definitions
of the bottom two levels you posted the other week. But I still think
the grouping is universal. You sound just like Anders who thought
the levels were "fuzzy" recently, but that's because it's hard to
isolate
the actual static patterns from the DQ and other patterns that are
interpenetrating them.
>That does not detract from its goodness or its power to transform us
>from residence in SOM-land to ascendancy in MoQ-land.
Don't give up on the levels, they are much more usable than that.
Magnus
>
-- post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:13 CEST