Doug Renselle (renselle@on-net.net)
Sun, 16 Nov 1997 17:55:21 +0100
Hugo,
I agree with your assessment here.
Diana, this paragraph, IMO, needs preservation on TLS site! It captures
the quintessence of MoQ in just a few lines.
Doug.
--Hugo Fjelsted Alroe wrote: > > Bo, I really like the way you put this!: > > >The Dynamic part of the MOQ cannot be defined. Naturally, because it > >is everything and nobody can step out of it to get a perspective. > >However, the Metaphysics of Quality postulates a "weak dynamic > >force"; a moral drift to escape limitations - whatever they are - for > >the ever freer. Up to now this it has created the four moral levels > >we recognize. > > Hugo > > -- > post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk > unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com > homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670 > >
-- " But quantum theory has destroyed the idea that only properties located in external physical objects have reality."Robert M. Pirsig, page 14 in his paper "Subjects, Objects, Data and Values," presented at the Einstein Meets Magritte conference, Fall 1995.
-- post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:14 CEST