Bodvar Skutvik (skutvik@online.no)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:16:47 +0100
22 Nov. Dave wrote:
> Bodvar & Squad
>
> About the name. How about something in between the generic FAQ and relegious
> Catechism like Quality-The Basics, Basic Qualities, or just The Basics.
Hello Dave and LS!.
Re. the name of the FAC/Catechism. Your suggestions are fine,
but we could make it even more weighty by borrowing from
Newton. What about "Principia Qualitaetis" (if that is proper latin)?
Re. the energy/matter division within the Inorganic level. See my
response to Magnus. In the early days of TLS we discussed heatedly
about a level "below" matter, but I believe we reached some sort of
agreement that there is no substance being acted upon by energy
and forces. The ephemeral nature of particles and energy isn't
important. "Patterns" may be discontious both in time and space and
still be Inorganic value.
Re. the "trashing" of SOM. I agree, but once you have adopted the
MOQ, it automatically takes precedence. The former isn't exactly
'trashed', but the terms of SOM will be used with a less fundamental
ring to it than now. Once more: like the up/down of Ptolemaian
cosmology which is used today, but in a more local and relative sense
after the Copernican revolution.
You wrote about revising your fine piece ("Strawdog.."), and
how to deliver it back to the Forum page. I for my part use the
web editor "AOL Press" which is a very good tool, but the Netscape
will surely do the job too. I would think that if you mail it
HTML-formatted, it can just be pasted in by Diana?
Keep on writing (and thinking)!
Bo
-- post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:15 CEST