Magnus Berg (MagnusB@DataVis.se)
Mon, 5 Jan 1998 21:13:00 +0100
Hi Diana and LS
>
>>From Magnus
>>The Quality principle
>>Quality is the origin of reality.
>
>Yes, Quality is the origin of reality but it is also reality itself. To
>say that Quality is the origin of reality without adding that it also IS
>reality suggests that reality is something other than Quality.
Maybe we should state what we mean with 'reality'. I used the
post-quality meaning of the word. Perhaps we must separate
the pre-quality reality and the post-quality reality?
>>Reality is the result of Quality Events. Quality Events are,
>>from within reality, often called observations.
>
>If we have a principle about Quality Events I think it should be
>separate as it confuses the issue. Are Quality Events mentioned in Lila?
>Can someone give me a reference?
I don't think it's in Lila. I think it originally comes from Bo's
"The Quality Event". It's a good idea to define it separately.
[...]
>
>Here's my revised principle of Quality:
>
>Quality is both reality and the force that creates reality. Quality is
>the ethical principle of the "Good". Thus, reality is a moral order.
The first sentence sounds like infinite regression. Is it really the
same reality in both cases or can we separate them more clearly?
Or is it meant to describe both static and dynamic quality?
Otherwise I like it.
Magnus
>
-- post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:37 CEST