LS SOM and Certainty


Platt Holden (pholden@worldnet.att.net)
Mon, 19 Jan 1998 05:47:46 +0100


Hi Diana:

Thanks for taking the time to explain why you excluded "Truth" from the
principles. You rationale is impeccable. Nevertheless, you came up with
what IMO is a high quality principle:

"Truth is an intellectual value pattern. There is no single truth, only
high quality and low quality truths."

I vote to include it in the principles on the ground that it makes a more
complete "painting" of the MoQ, a painting I would like better than one
without it. Although I could present reasons and evidence that might
convince you that a truth principle belongs, I doubt if I could persuade
you it's essential. (Generally I leave essentiality up to whatever Dynamic
Quality informs me at the moment. My capacity to be "stunned" varies from
day to day;-)

I sense the time is approaching when the Squad will have to accept your
judgment on these and other issues, a judgment I enormously respect. The
formula for failure is to try to please everybody. I doubt if everyone will
be completely satisfied with the principles we finally settle on. But to
settle on even three or four that most accept is a huge step forward for
the Squad. We' re indebted to you.

Best,

Platt

Catch 27. We try to make a distinction between reality and ideology, but
any definition of reality is an ideology.

--
post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:38 CEST