Magnus Berg (qmgb@bull.se)
Thu, 22 Jan 1998 05:17:27 +0100
Hi Anthony,
Ant McWatt wrote:
[A lot of hi Q stuff]
...
> Well, I hope the above will be helpful to you, Ken.
> I look forward to hearing your (or anyone else`s in the LS
> for that matter)comments on this ; especially any ideas you
> may have on the related subject of "space".
Lots'a cool stuff there Anthony. It really puts another
perspective on the "absoluteness" of the speed of light.
Sorry Lars. ;-)
Time is a derived concept through two or more stages,
this makes speed an even more complicated concept. It
depends not only on time, but on space also. The only thing
accomplished by putting the speed of light as the absolute
truth, is to hardwire space to time.
Makes me wonder if it is possible to take time or space as
the absolute instead and derive the rest from that.
Or maybe we could find other more basic concepts instead
of space, time and speed that would closer reflect the
ultimate reality.
Or perhaps we are bound to use them but must remember that
they are just derived concepts.
Magnus
-- post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:38 CEST