Doug Renselle (renselle@on-net.net)
Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:25:08 +0100
Kevin,
Accept my endorsement of your conclusion, re: sooner for MoQ rather
than later. And criticism is mandatory. Excellent!
Doug Renselle.
--Kevin Sanchez wrote: > > On the topic of Pirsig writing another book I would tell > Pirsig to DAMN > the critics! If he doesn't, he will be letting a social implication > (scorn > from critics) outweigh an intellectual, perhaps dynamic, one (writing > a > book.) Besides, I would say that critism is a healthy thing for a new > philosophy like MoQ. It increases awareness. In any revolution of > thought, > there are 3 stages. 1. it is ignored as stupid. 2. it is critized as > demon > spawn. 3. it is accepted as self-evident. The faster we get to a > widespread > 2nd stage, the sooner people will accept this philosophy as more > qualified > way of observing reality. > > Sincerely, > > Kevin Sanchez > > P.S: In fact, if anyone could forward this to Pirsig, I appreaciate it > (but > no as much as I would appreaciate another Pirsig novel.) > > -- > post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com > unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com > homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670 > >
-- The complementary view of truth is many truths which are contextual, and by being contextual they leave room for the good to rule. It is not objectivism, which has no place for the good, and it is not relativism, which has no place for truth.By Hugo Fjelsted Alroe in his email to The Lila Squad on 11 March 1998, 17:44 titled, "LS Re: Rambling on intellect and life."
-- post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:56 CEST