LS Re: Explain the subject-object metaphysics

Hettinger (hettingr@iglou.com)
Sat, 2 May 1998 20:18:30 +0100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Donald T Palmgren: "LS Explain the subject-object metaphysics"
• Previous message: Bodvar Skutvik: "LS Re: Explain the subject-object metaphysics"

Bo wrote:

> Chaos vs order" is the arch-dualism and definitely
> not SOM-related. And typically enough; the MOQ is a return to the C/O
> concept. Dynamic Q is chaos and Static Q is order.
>

Hmmm.... Maybe Dynamic Q is not really chaos. Maybe Dynamic Q is an
interface/link/accesspoint to chaos from within a static pattern.

Or, if Dynamic Q is chaos, and Static Q is order, then what is the
interface?Maggie

--
post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
 

• Next message: Donald T Palmgren: "LS Explain the subject-object metaphysics"
• Previous message: Bodvar Skutvik: "LS Re: Explain the subject-object metaphysics"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:14 CEST