Michael Darling (madarlin@ouray.cudenver.edu)
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 04:33:12 +0100
First- can't find the essays referred to in prior posts apparantly on
some
philosophical/metaphiscal nes list...
Also- I read a lot of things in a day- and most of it is useless other
than as grist for the mill, which is in no short supply.
I look forward to reading the squad posts- even when I don't get it or I
think they are way off.
After less thought about SQ/DQ, I think DQ as energy, or that which
changes and SQ as matter or that which stays the same are subtly amiss.
I'm starting to think the split is imaginary. If there is a useful
split-
I think it lies in process and processed. Ie, SQ is that which is
subjected to DQ. DQ is the process, the style or even just how things
occur.
MIchael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:28 CEST