LS Re: Growing consensus


Michael Darling (madarlin@ouray.cudenver.edu)
Sat, 18 Jul 1998 04:58:44 +0100


Agree DQ/SQ isn't matter/energy. Agree with others that it seems
pretty slippery to make it pattern/not pattern.

Martin:
"Dynamic Quality is the undefinable dynamic leading edge, it would be an
injustice to call it 'chaos,' 'energy,' 'the processor' and so forth. It
is the changes in the world..."

Agree. SQ is the changes, but when we go on to try and include
'morality' in those changes, it seems like we are heading toward 'why'
those changes occur. I think (and what I was trying to say before) is
that DQ is the 'how'- in other words the process- of those changes not
the why.

ciao

Michael

--
homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:28 CEST