LS Re: Dynamic vs Static split; DQ drives evolution


Hettinger (hettingr@iglou.com)
Mon, 27 Jul 1998 15:18:05 +0100


Hi, Platt, Andy and LS.

> SQ = that which can be defined and analyzed and therefore subjected to
> rational tests.
> DQ = evolution away from SQ, transcending SQ and thus not subject to
> rational analysis.
>

Platt, I know you guys are working through a particular aspect of DQ
(and I haven't been following closely), but still,

Don't you think there is a lot of existing SQ that cannot be defined,
analyzed and subjected to rational tests?

I'm thinking of
* all kinds of patterns that have evolved over time that haven't been
noticed
* patterns we don't know how to notice,
* patterns that people (intellect) don't value (and therefore cannot
define) but WOULD be valued by biology or the social level

cheers,

Maggie

--
homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:29 CEST