Platt Holden (pholden@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 29 Jul 1998 13:28:27 +0100
Hi Maggie and LS:
Maggie wrote:
> Don't you think there is a lot of existing SQ that cannot be defined,
> analyzed and subjected to rational tests?
>
> I'm thinking of
> * all kinds of patterns that have evolved over time that haven't been
> noticed
> * patterns we don't know how to notice,
> * patterns that people (intellect) don't value (and therefore cannot
> define) but WOULD be valued by biology or the social level
Yes, I agree with you. But we can't prove it, can we? The problem is
that although we may believe there are patterns outside our awareness,
we have direct evidence of only those that find a place in it. Still, as
assumptions go, this one ranks high on my confidence meter.
Great to hear your voice again on the LS.
Platt
-- homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:29 CEST