LS Re: Fuzzification clarified

Magnus Berg (qmgb@bull.se)
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 17:13:09 +0100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Jonathan B. Marder: "LS Re: Morality and DQ"
• Previous message: Hettinger: "LS Re: Dynamic vs Static split; DQ drives evolution"

Jonathan, Horse and Squad

Jonathan wrote:
> Once we subdivide SQ into classes and levels, platypi are inevitable and
> force the subdivisions to be reconsidered.

Horse wrote:
> There's also the problem of trying to force 'reality' into a box, or set
> of boxes, and then getting upset when that same 'reality' refuses to
> play the game.

I wrote:
> What I absolutely think is that all these division lines is
> crystal clear, and that's why the MoQ avoids contradictions.

See the difference? You both think that all divisions are bound
to fail and force fuzziness to save the day. I think that the
MoQ divisions are true METAphysical divisions, not just any
ad hoc divisions that seem to suffice for now. Am I being too
naive? Perhaps, but I think it's up to the future to decide.

        Magnus

-- 
"I'm so full of what is right, I can't see what is good"
                                N. Peart - Rush
--
homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org
 






Next message: Jonathan B. Marder: "LS Re: Morality and DQ"
Previous message: Hettinger: "LS Re: Dynamic vs Static split; DQ drives evolution"







This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 
on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:29 CEST