LS Re: Time and space and ...


Donald S. Rosenow (donangel@netusa1.net)
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:25:34 +0100


Hello, Bodvar and LS!

Bodvar - Thank-you for your kind comment. Writing is something I like to
do; I rarely think I am any good at it. Now, about those levels:

Bodvar Skutvik wrote:

>>The spatial continuum is made up of the three
>>dimensions of height, breadth and depth, but each dimension contains
>>an endless number of vectors. What's more; no one can tell
>>when one dimension ends and another begins, and yet; they are
>>discrete. How well does this reflect with your idea of the four
>>Q-levels and their sub-strata?

That's sounds like a good comparison. I am not as grounded in theory as I
should be - I re-read my post and shudder at my temerity in posting it on
a forum full of physicists - but it seems to me that time/space concepts
can be described that way. Without dragging causality into this, any
moment in time (or sub-level in a main level) is discrete, but its
attributes are a logical continuation of the preceding moment and directly
influence the following moment.

If this were not so, it would be impossible to predict anything.

I don't know if I have this exactly right. It feels right, though.

Don.

Don (and Donny) & Squad.

> Allow me a few irrelevant and relevant remarks re
> the exchange between you two.
>
> I agree with most of Troy's criticism of Donny's "Galathean Letter"
> of 28 Aug.(for days Donny sounds the pillar of wisdom. He agrees
> that "consciousness" is S-O- thinking (SOTAQI), the next moment he is
> at it again about SOM consciousness at the Inorganic level and
> subjective projecting of objects etc. :-)), but what really hit me
> was Troy's reference to the set opinions of his mother. I laughed
> half the morning and then some more, but it is just true! Regard the
> mass media commentaries; trite stuff, an ape colony's behaviour is
> pure freedom compared to it.
>
> Another thing. "Time"!!!!!!! It sounds obvious that time and space is
> necessary for any thing to exist, but "TIME" as we use it in
> theorizing is an intellectual value pattern. Real? Of course, the
> concepts of endless time and space scare us stiff. From time to time
> the SOM heritage lingers that Matter is the "real" thing while the
> other levels are mere mind superstructures, but that is not so. Not
> at all!!
>
> Don.
> I understand so well how you got paid to write. Your message of 1 Sep.
> was great reading both in form and content. At first I did not much
> like your idea of endless numbers of sub-levels to each Q-level, but
> then I started thinking and remembered the squad's early encounter
> with the four levels when some agreement was obtained on the space
> dimensions analogue. The spatial continuum is made up of the three
> dimensions of height, breadth and depth, but each dimension contains
> an endless number of vectors. What's more; no one can tell
> when one dimension ends and another begins, and yet; they are
> discrete. How well does this reflect with your idea of the four
> Q-levels and their sub-strata?
>
> Bodvar.
>
> --
> homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad
> unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org
>

--
homepage - http://www.moq.org/lilasquad
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:lilasquad@moq.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:43:45 CEST