From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 15:44:36 GMT
Hi Wim:
> You wrote:
> 'the crab is also possessed by Quality and has direct experience of value'.
>
> For me 'being possessed by Quality' refers to MoQ thinking and 'having
> experience of value' refers to SOM thinking.
Would you care to expand on why you think "being possessed by
Quality refers to MoQ thinking and "having experience of value refers to
to SOM thinking?" Could you give some examples of the two different
types of thinking? Which of the two types of thinking makes the
distinction between types of thinking?
> The value 'I' (or the crab)
> experiences is not the same Quality that creates 'me' or the crab.
The Quality I experience is not the same Quality that created me? I
thought Quality (Value) was pure, direct experience and that the
Dynamic aspect of Quality was the force that created everything. You
seem to suggest there is more than one Quality whereas I consider
Quality to be a single, all embracing, ineffable entity synonymous with
the "inner light" or "Divine One"-- the basic premise we agree on in our
approach to the MoQ. In other words, I believe the light within a crab is
the same light that is within me, the only difference being that my light
compared to the crabs shines forth with greater freedom and versatility.
Do we understand Quality differently?
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 13 2002 - 15:52:31 GMT