MD Our Immoral Supreme Court

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 20:41:59 BST

  • Next message: Joseph Maurer: "Re: MD Clearing up this intellectual mess"

    Hi All,

    I don't know what the law is in other countries, but here in the U.S. we
    enjoyed a legal right to own property. I say "enjoyed" because last week
    our Supreme Court in a 5-4 split decision struck down property rights by
    ruling that government can bulldoze your home if it stands in the way of a
    corporate entity who wants to use your property to build a facility that
    will increase the government's tax base. In other words, you can be forced
    from your home to make room for a hotel or shopping mall.

    Heretofore, the government could condemn and take property under the laws
    of eminent domain for obvious public uses such as roads, bridges, military
    installations and the like. Now the Court has broadened the eminent domain
    concept to include the taking of private property for the purpose of
    increasing tax receipts and fattening the pocketbooks of corporations.

    Anti-capitalist liberals should be outraged. But, they're largely silent.
    Why? Because once the liberal principle of redistribution of income
    through government taxation was sanctioned in the name of the "public
    good," then any property produced by intellect (which accounts for all
    human goods and services) belongs not to the producer, but to any social
    entity who wields the power of government to claim it.

    Pirsig described this moral conflict involved when he wrote:

    "That's what this whole century's been about, this struggle between
    intellectual and social patterns. That's the theme song of the twentieth
    century. Is society going to dominate intellect or is intellect going to
    dominate society?" (Lila, 13)

    And the social patterns are winning. As Pirsig pointed out, intellect,
    being objective-dominated, cannot observe or measure moral values and is
    thus impotent against the social moral claim of "the public interest." As
    a result, with this latest Court decision immorality triumphs again,
    individual freedom is further compromised, and the road to serfdom grows
    ever wider.

    Best,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 28 2005 - 20:40:20 BST