Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review

• Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Next in thread: bahna@rpi.edu: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

But that's me trying to fit Quality into my 'everything is expectation'
thesis. Squonk, Matt EE, and all, I'd be interested, if I could tear you
away from this discussion, in your thoughts...

Johnny

Hi there,
All the best with your thread.
At the moment, all i can think of to say is that DQ is unexpected and SQ is
expected. Hope that helps?
To link that with morality, patterns are moral in their relationships -
relationships which are subject to dynamic intervention. There is nothing
immoral about long standing and well trusted patterns, however. And dynamic
change can appear dreadful in the instant!
I apologise if you already know, agree or dismiss this? But i am a little
tired!
Hoping you have a quality insight!

squonk

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Changes"
• Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Next in thread: bahna@rpi.edu: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:34:03 GMT