From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sun Aug 17 2003 - 14:23:47 BST
An objective reality may be taken for granted, but so is the subjective
reality, the two are mutually dependent! The point of interest for the
MOQ is that once we start to inquire into the S/O the subjective side
comes out as the "winner" (the empiricists, Berkeley primarily) which
is untenable and what brought Kant to objectivity's resque and ended
up with the ephemeral "Ding an Sich", cementing the S/O ...all this
leading to Phedrus's Quality insight. My point is that repeating this
SOM-based argumentation which went BEFORE the MOQ as if it
applies AFTERWARDS ..isn' useful
squonk: There are no subjects and objects in the MoQ. Subjects and objects
are artistic creations of the intellect. As such, they are patterns of
intellectual value.
Phaedrus did not have a quality insight as such - rather, he was given to
contemplating Quality from a source out of the Blue. It was the contemplation of
Quality that lead to the realisation that subjects and objects are artistic
creations of the intellect, and therefore not primary reality.
squonk
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 17 2003 - 14:24:15 BST