Re: MD quality religion

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 21 2004 - 16:56:12 GMT

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: Definition: Religion [was Re: MD quality religion]"

    Hi

    That could be fun.

    DM
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jim Ledbury" <jim.ledbury@dsl.pipex.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 3:31 PM
    Subject: Re: MD quality religion

    > Maybe we ought to do a Big Brother and vote a religion out of the house
    > until we have a winner ;-)
    >
    > Might take too long though.
    >
    > ATB
    > Jim
    >
    > Wim Nusselder wrote:
    >
    > >Dear MoQists interested in an 'Idols'-like competition between religions,
    > >
    > >Platt presented (13 Mar 2004 08:59:41 -0500) 'pursuing Dynamic Quality by
    > >creating and contemplating art as well as by pursuing beauty in all my
    > >endeavors' as best religion.
    > >I have nominated Quakerism and will present it in due course.
    > >Sam more or less promised 21 Mar 2004 11:57:35 -0000 to make the case for
    (I
    > >guess) Anglicanism as soon as his hectic life give's him a chance to do
    so.
    > >
    > >David B. 20 Mar 2004 14:56:56 -0700 declined to nominate a non-Western
    > >religion, because -being a Western person- that would imply (in Jung's
    > >words) theft.
    > >That's fine, I'd say: as nominators we also need an audience, people who
    (in
    > >the 'Idols' model) decide by voting which religion wins the contest.
    > >
    > >I presented 12 Mar 2004 08:30:40 +0100 a proposal for the format of the
    > >contest. The first step was:
    > >'someone starts presenting a religion as soon as we think that enough
    people
    > >on this list may be interested to present their favourite religion as
    > >potential "idol" and to vote on it.'
    > >
    > >I don't think 3 nominators and 1 non-nominating voter is enough yet. WHO
    > >ELSE WANTS TO PARTICIPATE in one role or the other?
    > >
    > >Maybe Joe or Don (drose) might want to nominate (AND seriously present)
    > >Catholicism (having more or less identified themselves as followers)?
    > >Don (drose), did you already invite the Mormon and the evangelical you
    wrote
    > >about 10 Mar 2004 19:45:48 -0500?
    > >Leland, Matt P., Jon, David M., Steve P., Jim, Steve (arborealman), Matt
    K.
    > >and others lurking in this thread until now: Would you be willing to
    > >act -with David B.- as audience/voters/jury?
    > >
    > >With friendly greetings,
    > >
    > >Wim
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > >Mail Archives:
    > >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > >Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 21 2004 - 17:50:11 GMT