RE: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Jul 11 2004 - 18:01:34 BST

  • Next message: Dan Glover: "Re: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise"

    > dmb adds:
    > Yea, we should have warned you, Arlo. Platt is entirely imprevious to facts
    > or logic.

    Personal attack. No evidence to support.

    > Its not that he fails to read what you write, it only SEEMS that
    > way. Even when he's presented with contrary ideas from the guy who
    > literally wrote the book on the MOQ, Platt remains a Randian dittohead.

    Personal attack. No evidence to support.

    > Apparently, there is nothing you or anyone else can say that will change
    > that - not even if Pirsig says it. For example...
    >
    > Pirsig says in LILA (Chapter 17):
    > "The conservatives [i.e. read capitalists] who keep trumpeting about the
    > virtues of free enterprise are normally just supporting their own
    > self-interest. They are just doing the usual cover-up for the rich in their
    > age-old exploitation of the poor.

    Distortion by omission: Pirsig says: "A free market is a Dynamic
    institution." (Lila, 17)

    > Even though Pirsig also says:
    > "From a static point of view socialism is more moral than capitalism. Its a
    > higher form of evolution. It is an intellectually guided society, not just
    > a society based on mindless traditions."

    Distortion by omission: Pirsig says: "But what the socialists left out and
    what has all but killed their whole undertaking is an absence of a concept
    of indefinite Dynamic Quality."

    > AND (Pirsig's emphasis)
    >
    > "It is not that Victorian social economic patterns are more moral than
    > socialist intellectual economic patterns. Quite the opposite. They are LESS
    > moral as static patterns go."

    Distortion by omission. Pirsig says, "What makes the free-enterprise
    system superior is that the socialists, reasoning intelligently and
    objectively, have inadvertently closed the door to Dynamic Quality in the
    buying and selling of things."

    > dmb concludes:
    > So what's my point? Don't be discouraged. Platt SEEMS to have NOT read
    > everything he's read. But others are not only reading and comprehending,
    > but also enjoying what you write.

    Platt concludes:
    DMB has read Lila, but ignores what doesn't fit his socialist agenda. He
    is impervious to logic and facts. Evidence above supports.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 11 2004 - 17:59:18 BST