LS Re: Intelligence vs Intellect.


Gene Kofman (its@icanect.net)
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:54:16 +0100


Maggie wrote:
> Gene Kofman wrote:
>
> > <snip>
> > When we move from one society/culture to another we still continue for
> > quite awhile to follow social patterns of the society we left behind.
Of
> > course, many of the patterns don't work in the new social environment,
> > which brings about a lot of DQ opportunities.
> > <snip>
>
> Does anybody see a distinction here between DQ, the "source of all
things, the
> pre-intellecutal cutting edge of reality" and the instance of DQ that
Gene
> mentioned above--a "contained" type of DQ that exists because of the
> interaction of different static social PoV's (each of which has a
different
> mix of influence of the others, and therefore a somewhat different
> "direction", but still, in general, is somehow bound to be part of the
> direction that the social level as a whole shares)? Something that
would
> seem, to all appearances from within the social level, to be
indistinguishable
> from DQ, but from without would appear to be a small dynamic influence
within
> the general influence of static social patterns?

I'm glad that I confused the issue by using DQ instead of QEs. It prompted
a great recap from Doug. Sorry and thank you.

Gene.

----------
> From: Hettinger <hettingr@iglou.com>
> To: Multiple recipients of <skwok@spark.net.hk>
> Subject: LS Re: Intelligence vs Intellect.
> Date: Tuesday, October 21, 1997 11:30 AM
>
> Gene Kofman wrote:
>
> > <snip>
> > When we move from one society/culture to another we still continue for
> > quite awhile to follow social patterns of the society we left behind.
Of
> > course, many of the patterns don't work in the new social environment,
> > which brings about a lot of DQ opportunities.
> > <snip>
>
> Does anybody see a distinction here between DQ, the "source of all
things, the
> pre-intellecutal cutting edge of reality" and the instance of DQ that
Gene
> mentioned above--a "contained" type of DQ that exists because of the
> interaction of different static social PoV's (each of which has a
different
> mix of influence of the others, and therefore a somewhat different
> "direction", but still, in general, is somehow bound to be part of the
> direction that the social level as a whole shares)? Something that
would
> seem, to all appearances from within the social level, to be
indistinguishable
> from DQ, but from without would appear to be a small dynamic influence
within
> the general influence of static social patterns?
>
> (I can see that I need to get a handle on this "direction" concept that I
want
> to use without being able to demonstrate it. Doug, are my contexts
clear at
> all?)
>
> Maggie
>
> PS hmm... maybe I just defined social quality.
>
>
>
> --
> post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk
> unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
> homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
>
>

--
post message - mailto:skwok@spark.net.hk
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:06 CEST