Hi Jeff, Roger and all
ROGER wrote:
> Jeff,
> OK, I am intrigued. What blow does "negative" quality give to the
MOQ? And
> while we are at it, is there even such a thing as "negative" quality,
or just
> an absence-of-quality?
>
Please go back to 6th March (Random Patterns thread) and have a look at
my post headed thus:
>JONATHAN PLACES RANDOMNESS AT
>ZERO ON A "GOOD TO BAD" SCALE THAT
>GOES FROM POSITIVE TO NEGATIVE
Maybe I'm not being very humble, but I think that it was a good post
that is very relevant to the point Jeff has raised.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:42 BST