In a message dated 5/25/02 1:50:06 AM GMT Daylight Time, enoonan@kent.edu
writes:
<< Erin: I still see that unified/not unified as ultimately a duality even
when
it is described as a continuum. I see how your schematic is non-spatial but
I
am not quite yet seeing the a-temporal part of it yet.
It just seemed that your schematic was a vertical/temporal duality and the
original was a horizontal/spatial duality. I don't think I quite grasped
the
marble analogy--I will think about it some more and see if I grasp the idea
better
>>
hi erin,
please excuse the lack of capitols - my cat 'tigi' is in my arms as i type!
this is not going to stop me typing with one hand though!
i do not fell cats have a classic sense of underlying form?
tigi seems to have on occasion!
anyway, the marbles. what can the classic say about the romantic?
a neuroscientist may feel there is going to be much to say if one cannot say
enough at this point?
analogy, simile, poetry, rhetoric can be more charming, and if you approach
the marble analogy from a classic perspective, (no pun intended -
perspicuous, marbles? geddit? huh!)
then you may constrict your thinking somewhat?
i am sure you know this and i apologise for sounding off!
all the best,
squonk, and tigi.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:16 BST