Re: MD Schematic.

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sat May 25 2002 - 11:46:37 BST


In a message dated 5/25/02 2:02:53 AM GMT Daylight Time,
gershomdreamer@yahoo.com writes:

<< Subj: Re: MD Schematic.
 Date: 5/25/02 2:02:53 AM GMT Daylight Time
 From: gershomdreamer@yahoo.com (Gary Jaron)
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
 Classic Quality and Romantic Quality are human constructs. They are ways
 that humans devised to divide up the world. They are roughly the equivalent
 of yin and yang or intellect and emotions. Classic roughly = yang &
 intellectual understanding. Romantic roughly = yin & emotional
 understanding. Actually they are a continuum with CQ at one end and RQ at
 the other. We can choose to examine anything intellectually or emotionally.
 Classic Quality has esthetic aspects and Romantic Quality has underlying
 form aspects. They are not the same as Dynamic - Static Quality. Dynamic &
 Static are inherent in the nonverbal objects. All things human and nonhuman
 have aspects of Dynamic and Static Quality within them. All this is made
 clearer in my essay which will be posted next week.
 Gary Jaron >>

sounds rather like your classic mind is off its leash!
the schematic is itself a product of classical thinking and as such has
problems conveying the underlying form of rationality itself.
the yin-yan icon may be offered up at this point for contemplation and leave
it at that for a while? or.....

'my end is in my begining' t.s. elliot.

all the best,
squonk.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:16 BST