In a message dated 7/2/02 3:56:53 AM GMT Daylight Time, jhmau@sbcglobal.net
writes:
> skutvik July 01, 9:20
> Bo says: NOTA BENE.
> >Here I part company with most of the discussers who believe that S/O is an
> intellectual
> >pattern that can be replaced by another (better) one, but I can't for the
> life of me understand
> >what is intellect's (value) except for the S/O, and how it can mend itself
> in such a
> >fundamental way. It is as if LIFE suddenly would become DEATH. I have
> asked
> for a
> >definition of it, but none such has been presented without vague
> suggestions about "self-
> >reflection" and "thinking" and such which are the very halfs of the
> "consciousness" variants
> >mentioned above ...which is playing straight into the hands of Intellect.
> end of NB
>
Hi Bo,
Do you feel subjects and objects are the result of cultural conditioning?
If so, i agree.
Then intellect may use cultural conditioning for abstract speculation, thus
intellect can be seen to be seriously influenced by cultural patterns.
If we wish to erode subjects and objects, it would appear we must orient our
culture towards value?
All the best,
Squonk.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:24 BST