Gary,
Like I said, you have made a list of assertions. You
seem to believe them and be happy with them. What else
is there for an antagonist do to? :)
André
--- Gary Jaron <gershomdreamer@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi
Andre, [How do you get that little mark over
> your "e"? I don't mean to
> ignore it but I don't know how to do it using
> Outlook Express. ]
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: André <psytrancekid@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: MD Consciousness
>
>
> > > >
> > > Gary's Response: The mind is the "place" of all
> > > mental activities. It is
> > > the experience of having a body that can process
> and
> > > be aware of existing.
> > > The mind is recognizing that we can hear own
> > > thoughts and that we can see,
> > > feel, taste, touch, etc. The self is our
> construct
> > > that develops over time
> > > to identify ourselves and different from other
> > > people we meet.
> > > Self-awareness is the process built into our
> body,
> > > especially in our nervous
> > > system. If when we sleep we dream then we are
> > > experiencing self-awareness.
> > > If when we sleep we do not seem to dream then
> there
> > > is no experience of
> > > self-awareness. Self-awareness is an experience
> of
> > > a process of mental
> > > activity of the body. "mind-awareness"?
> Perhaps.
> > > Those objects:
> > > cameras, thermometers, tears, etc are all
> passive
> > > tools which were not built
> > > to be aware of the activities that they are
> engaged
> > > in doing. Thus no
> > > self-awareness. No mind. The mind requires a
> self
> > > reflexive,
> > > self-reflective, and recursive structure.
> > >
> > > Gary
> >
> > Your argument style is a stream of assertions. I
> will
> > leave you with those assertions intact.
> >
> > Blue is red.
> >
> > cheers,
> > André
> Gary's response: Actually my style tends to be, or
> so I have been told,
> verbose and repetitive. Hence the length of my
> essays! If you do not want
> brevity I can give you more than "streams of
> assertions". I was not trying
> to be obtuse by simply making those strings of
> assertions. I was just being
> brief. If you want more, I will go back and explain
> in more detail. So,
> shall we leave the matter with strings of assertions
> or shall we go back and
> thoroughly analyze? It is your call.
>
> The ever assertive,
> Gary
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
> instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:25 BST