--- Horse <horse@darkstar.uk.net> wrote: > Hi All
>
> On 15 Jul 2002 at 23:30, André wrote:
>
> > Platt,
> >
> > How many ways can "Quality is Reality" be
> interpreted?
> >
> > Let me try one.
> > The set of all real things equals the set of all
> > quality things. Can't be. The term quality is
> > redundant.
>
> So:
>
> Quality = Reality
>
> So if X = Quality and X = Reality (because Quality =
> Reality) then X is redundant is it?
>
> So Reality is redundant.
>
> Or:
>
> The set of all real things and the set of all
> quality things are identical
> As one is redundant so must the other be.
>
> Again Reality is redundant
>
> Hmm!
>
> Maybe on your planet
>
>
> Horse
>
"Quality is Reality" is tautology when the sets are
the same.
The other interpretation of Quality is Reality is like
"Blood is Red". This is a property relation.
So is Reality is a property of Quality? What other
properties does Quality have?
Any more interpretations of "Quality is Reality"?
André
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:26 BST