> George, it might b e more useful if you addressed the gist of my
> comments. including the larger portion which you ignore here. I do not
> consider myself a Darwinist, so you arrow misses any mark relevant to
> me. It is true that people dislike in others that which they dislike in
> themselves - and why not, we know it best <smile> -- but I think you
> are using this as a red herring: the issue was your prophet's
> prophecies, was it not?
>
> It is of no matter to me whether you hold to your beliefs or not,
> frankly. But if we are to discuss them and how they have formed - which
> is what we have been talking about for these last several emails - then
> let us do so without rancor or defensiveness. Otherwise it is simply
> not worth it.
>
> Cordially,
> Lawry
Excuse me for not jumping for joy at being proved a superstitious fool:
perhapsevolutionists have now found their missing link after all. It seems to me
you would not be satisfied with anything less than engraved stone tablets.
Quality, the Tao, God are not like that: rather they are experienced with
something other than the 5 senses, indeed with something other than
intellect. I know I am the richer for that; I hope you and everybody else
can be too.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:28 BST