MD No man is an Island- except Crusoe.

From: Fintan Dunne (findunne@iol.ie)
Date: Tue Dec 08 1998 - 23:53:14 GMT


Hi Bo,

BODVAR>
>Robinson Crusoe! My childhood hero not an example of IntPoVs?
>Well, you may be right, but will perhaps agree with me
>that he was the Enlightenment DREAM - the free-floating intellect
>that would work regardless of ambient conditions.

I will just let my friend Christopher Caudwell address the issue of Crusoe.

Except to say that Intellectualism is the isolation of the ivory tower and
is reflected in the complete social isolation of Crusoe and his ilk.

        ILLUSION AND REALITY by Christopher Caudwell.
        --------------------------------------------------------------------

---
        This is the bourgeois dream, the dream of the
         one man alone producing the phenomena of the world. He is
         Faust, Hamlet, Robinson Crusoe, Satan and Prufrock.

This "individualism" of the bourgeois, which is born of the need to dissolve the restrictions of feudal society causes a tremendous and ceaseless technical advance in production. In the same way it causes in poetry a tremendous and ceaseless advance in technique.

The capitalist finds his very individualism, his very freedom, producing all the blind coercion of war, anarchy, slump and revolution. The machine in its productiveness finally threatens even him. The market in its blindness becomes a terrifying force of nature. By means of the market, capitalist constantly hurls down fellow capitalist into wage-labour or relegates him to the ranks of the temporarily privileged "salariat". The artisan of yester day is the factory hand of today.

This is the dramatic process whereby capitalism revolutionises itself. It does so by means of the very free market on which the bourgeois depends for freedom. This guarantee of in- dividualism and independence produces the very opposite- trustification and dependence on finance capital. This golden garden of fair competition produces the very opposite of fair- ness: price-cutting, wars, cartels, monopolies, "corners" and vertical trusts. But all these evils seem to the bourgeois, who is hurled from his freedom by them, to be-as indeed they are ~direct and coercive social relations and he revolts against them as the very opposite of his ideal recipe: the free market.

He therefore revolts against them by demanding a fairer market and keener competition, without realising that since these ills are created by the free market, to demand the intensification of its freedom is to demand an intensification of the slavery he hates. He therefore drives on the movement he detests, and can only escape by escaping from the bourgeois contradiction. The bourgeois is always talking about liberty because it is always slipping from his grasp.

He finds the loneliness which is the condition of his freedom unendurable and coercive. He finds more and more of his experience of the earth and the universe unfriendly and a restraint on his freedom. He ejects everything social from his soul, and finds that it deflates, leaving him petty, empty and insecure.

How has this come about? We can only discover why if we now cease to take the bourgeois at his own valuation, and lay bare the economic motion of which his own valuation of him- self is the reflection. At each stage the bourgeois finds that his abolition of social ''restrictions'' leads to their intensification.

His drive towards a free market exposes the producer to a gale of competition of which the only outcome is-an amalgama- tion. His destruction of feudal "complexities" in favour of the simple bourgeois right to property produces all the staggering elaboration of the bourgeois law of contract. His hate of feudal rule and social coercion produces the strongly-centralised, bourgeois State with its endless petty interferences with the liberty of the individual. Individualism has produced anti- individualism. The very economy whose mission it seemed to be to sweep away all social relations, produces a society more overwhelmingly complex than any hitherto known.

His demand for freedom is a negation of freedom. He is a mirror- revolutionary" and continually revolutionises society by asking for that which will procure the opposite of what he desires.

Love

Fintan Mary Dunne

homepage - http://www.moq.org queries - mailto:moq@moq.org unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in body of email



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:43 BST