Kilian:
I don't see why "halves" is not a "proper" analogy.
glove:
because Dynamic Quality simply is not half of reality the way we think of
half. take your reality-coin example...heads and tails...2 halves, simple!
its not though. the entire reality coin is static quality, both sides.
Dynamic Quality is beyond that conceptual realization of reality coin and
yet it creates, enfolds and discreates the reality coin.
Kilian:
I guess its my turn to be unsure of what you're saying here. My point
was, post-rational mystical insight into reality is commonly a personal
occurance (seeing the light). That being the case, how does a
self-proclaimed mystic convey something like this to the squad
accurately?
Glove:
i guess my point is that the more Dynamic the vision the less acceptance it
will find among others, no matter how elegantly the language does justice to
the idea. and there may come a time when its no longer necessary to even
attempt to convey anything to anyone. this may seem like a low-value
situation unless its understood that the reason it is no longer necessary to
convey anything is because there is nothing to convey. all that we convey is
already known anyway. how can an already full cup be filled any farther?
best wishes,
glove
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:44 BST