>From owner-moq_discuss@mill.venus.co.uk Mon Jan 11 17:07:15 1999
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) id BAA05451
> for moq_discuss-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 01:05:56 GMT
>Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net
[194.159.73.20])
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA05447
> for <moq_discuss@moq.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 01:05:54 GMT
>Received: from [194.159.224.65] (helo=wasted)
> by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1)
> id 0zzsHn-0005XC-00
> for moq_discuss@moq.org; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 01:06:23 +0000
>From: "Horse" <horse@wasted.demon.nl>
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 01:07:53 -0000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Subject: MD Message from the Administrator to Paul Vogel & Others
>X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
>Message-Id: <E0zzsHn-0005XC-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>
>Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>
>Paul
Dear Horse,
>
>In the last few hours you have posted two messages and ignored the
charter and
>rules that have recently been posted.
Sorry. I was responding to insults. Even the devil, has his day in
court, doesn´t he?
>
>Rule 4 states:
>4) Members should reproduce only the relevant parts of any previous
message to
>which they are responding.
>
>You have ignored this in both your posts - please do not do so in
future.
They seemed relevant to me at the time. Do I have to ask what is
relevant from someone first?
>
>Rule 8 states:
>8) Members should refrain from swearing, using offensive language and
personal
>attacks on other members. Abuse, in any form, will not be tolerated.
>
>You have ignored this in your second post with a personal attack on
Mary. Do not
>repeat this.
Excuse me Horse, but it was Mary that labeled me, in a personal attack,
first. Check the posts! Or, are you excercising fiat with the rules, and
favoritism?
>
>The Charter quite plainly states:
>
>The MOQ_DISCUSS mailing list is an unmoderated mailing list.
>Members should observe the Rules of the list in order that discussions
can be
>conducted in in a civilized and reasonably courteous manner. Members
are
>encouraged to become involved in dialogue and debate but are requested
to
>refrain from flaming and abusive behaviour of all kinds.
>
>and again you have ignored the above.
No I have not, but I have merely defended myself from baseless attacks!
>
>If you intend to continue posting to MOQ_DISCUSS then stick to the
rules and
>observe the charter or don't post.
Hey! Enforce your rules equally, or are some pigs more equal than
others, Horse?
>
>If you feel that you have a valid point to make about Cosmotheism and
how it may
>relate to the MOQ then please make it in a reasoned and courteous
manner. This
>forum is for the discussion of the MOQ but can quite reasonably
incorporate other
>material which members feel relates to the MOQ and enhances the
position of the
>MOQ in the thinking of other authors and philosophers. It is intended
that we
>examine a broad range of subjects.
I would be glad to do so, when I have more time. My comments are for
those more familiar with Cosmotheism, and not just from hostile, and
inaccurate reviews!
>
>Others:
>
>If you are replying to posts please exercise restraint. Racist, sexist,
credist (?)
>etc. contributions and their authors will be dealt with by the
Administrator and
>appropriate action - including exclusion from the list - will be
exercised where
>necessary. Please do not descend to the levels of abuse employed by
bigots.
Whom is the true bigot with these " Politically Correct " Rules!
>
>And Finally:
>
>There have been a few borderline cases of flaming and mild disrespect
recently
>but I feel these fall within the limits of reasonable discourse and as
such have not
>felt it necessary to post. However please read the rules and think
about how they
>relate to what you are writing or have written. They are there to
encourage the use
>of "netiquette" not to restrict the flow of discussion.
No! They do indeed restrict the flow of discussion! I was not the one
who hides behind labels of abuse!
Please do not abuse the
>charter and rules of the list.
I had not the time to read the rules, but just follow the Golden Rule.
Apparently, that is not good enough for this squad, huh?
>
>
>Horse
Paul.
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:49 BST