Re: MD Many truths and Shroedinger's cat.

From: RISKYBIZ9@aol.com
Date: Tue Jan 26 1999 - 03:36:39 GMT


Roger Gets Mysty on Everyone

To Struan and Jonathan and Glove and all:

I have never really fancied applying quantum uncertainty to classical cats (
my cat actually prefers jazz), except as an analogy. In fact, didn't some
scientists recently prove that the effects disappear beyond the quantum level?

The point i want to make is that anyone that believes in particles, a) doesn't
follow the MOQ, and b) doesn't agree with modern physics.

Particles are abstract intellectual concepts describing value interactions.
Waves are abstract intellectual concepts describing value interactions. Value
creates the subject (self) and the object (cat), and it creates the concepts
of self , cat , particle and wave. Of course, complex objects are formed by
countless trillions of value interactions. But a quantum event , a quantum
QUALITY EVENT, is as close as objective science can get to pure value. They
can get close enough to know it doesn't exist as a distinct OBJECT until
interaction occurs.

The complementary distinction I have been referring to is the
mystical/intellectual division.......From one perspective the world is perfect
unity and quality, the other perspective is abstract and distinct and
oppositional. Such is how we bring forth the world. Clark's universe is
brought forth in just such a way. We are bringing forth the world....no the
world is bringing forth us......no we are all one.........oh I think I am
losing it.....or is it gaining it??????

I think I'm turning mystical......

Rog

MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mailing List Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Queries - mailto:moq@moq.org

Unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with
UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in the body of the email



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:50 BST