Yes it can, and in Art too. But for this we have to come back to the SPQ
structure.
We can see at every application trial of an SPQ another refutation test [If
I do so and so I suppose to get quality, so I'll do it, do I get quality?].
But in Art there is a trend opposing Science, meaning that every SPQ
[quality combination] tends to get other related combinations [other SPQ]
and you go for maximum meaning. The SPQ don't compete but form a cluster. In
Sciences you go for the minimal SPQ possible [i.e. the SPQ compete with one
another].
In general analogy [I know the comparison sucks in detail, but generally I
believe it holds water] we can compare it with the difference between SPQ in
the biological level, i.e. between animals and plants, animals live of other
animals or plants [believe in minimal meaning as science does], and plants
believe in maximal meaning, living next to each other and not of one
another. [This are virgin ideas, handle with care].
and don't forget to be gentle
Avid
icq 6598359
----- Original Message -----
From: <RISKYBIZ9@aol.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Montag, 20. September 1999 14:31
Subject: MD Re:Theories
> Avid,
>
> Yes, I agree that the two best theories out there ...quantum physics and
> General Relativity are not the final theories. They are the best two, but
> they are sure to be replaced with better theories or with a combined
theory
> eventually. (Believe it or not, I actually have a theory of my own which
> combines both yet negates neither. I am not a physicist or even the
greatest
> mathematician though, so my assumption is that my idea is full of BS. It
is
> probably wrong in a dozen ways.....but since I don't have the faith in my
> knowledge to bring my idea forward, I guess I will never know until
someone
> else solves the problem. I guess their is nothing wrong with trying to be
> creative?)
>
> By the way, I have continued to read into Popper. I find it captivating
how
> his theory of science shows that we have established a culture of
evolution,
> where ideas are allowed to compete... and not based on some sole
aristotelian
> truth, but on quality. I wonder if the process could be used outside of
> science? I suspect it is to some extent in the free enterprise system and
> capitalism... where ideas are allowed to succeed or fail, to grow or
whither,
> based on their success in the marketplace.
>
> Roger
>
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:11 BST