Hi Ken,
IMHO Pirsig makes it clear that Dynamic Quality is no different 
from your “Evolutionary Quality” and that it was around long before 
intellect ever put in an appearance. 
>From Lila, Chap. 11:
“Good! The "undefined fittest" they are defending is identical to 
Dynamic Quality. Natural selection is Dynamic Quality at work. 
There is no quarrel whatsoever between the Metaphysics of Quality 
and the Darwinian Theory of Evolution. Neither is there a quarrel 
between the Metaphysics of Quality and the "teleological" theories 
which insist that life has some purpose. What the Metaphysics of 
Quality has done is unite these opposed doctrines within a larger 
metaphysical structure that accommodates both of them without 
contradiction.”
“On the other hand, the shift in cell reproduction from mitosis to 
meiosis to permit sexual choice and allow huge DNA diversification 
is a Dynamic advance. So is the collective organization of cells into 
metazoan societies called plants and animals. So are sexual 
choice, symbiosis, death and regeneration, communality, 
communication, speculative thought curiosity and art. Most of 
these, when viewed in a substance-centered evolutionary way, are 
thought of as mere incidental properties of the molecular machine. 
But in a value-centered explanation of evolution they are close to 
the Dynamic process itself, pulling the pattern of life forward to 
greater levels of versatility, and freedom.
“Sometimes a Dynamic increment goes forward but can find no 
latching mechanism and so fails and slips back to a previous 
latched position. Whole species and cultures get lost this way. 
Sometimes a static pattern becomes so powerful it prohibits any 
Dynamic moves forward. In both cases the evolutionary process is 
halted for a while. But when it's not halted the result has been an 
increase in power to control hostile forces or an increase in 
versatility or both. The increase in versatility is directed toward 
Dynamic Quality. The increase in power to control hostile forces is 
directed toward static quality. Without Dynamic Quality the 
organism cannot grow. Without static quality the organism cannot 
last. Both are needed.”
>From Lila Chap. 12
“So what Phaedrus was saying was that not just life, but 
everything, is an ethical activity. It is nothing else. When inorganic 
patterns of reality create life the Metaphysics of Quality postulates 
that they've done so because it's "better" and that this definition of 
"betterness"—this beginning response to Dynamic Quality—is an 
elementary unit of ethics upon which all right and wrong can be 
based.”
I don’t mean to bore you with these long quotes. Just quoting the 
line, “Natural selection is Dynamic Quality at work” should be 
sufficient to refute your idea that there are two different types of 
Dynamic Quality in Lila, one that operated before humans and 
another that came after. I don’t see where Pirsig makes any such 
distinction, nor can I find a single reference in Pirsig’s writings to 
“Evolutionary Quality.” 
Finally, it makes no sense to me that a “good universe” would 
deliberately set about to create a bunch of not-so-good human 
beings. Isn’t there a contradiction in there someplace?
Best, 
Platt
> Apropros of nothing I feel a desire to point out to you that the DQ that is
> talked about here is not the Evolutionary Quality that produced the
> universe.
>   This DQ is human DQ otherwise it could not be "the preintellectual
> cutting edge of reality (No intellect when Evolutionary Quality operates).
> I seem to be the only one who thinks that Pirsig talks about the operation
> of two different types of Quality in Lila, Evolutionary Quality which was
> present at the beginning and is responsible for the good and valuable and
> moral universe which we inhabit, and Human Dynamic Quality which operates
> alongside of Evolutionary Quality and is capable of producing functions
> which are not moral. It seems he uses Evolutionary Quality and Dynamic
> Quality to distinguish the two. Ken
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:14 BST