From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Tue Oct 26 2004 - 04:34:04 BST
On 25 Oct 2004 at 18:29, Erin wrote:
Hi,
I am not trying to give you a hard time mel. I am just truly
confused athow you distinguish these things.I'm getting dizzy
trying to figure out what the heck your argument is.....remind mewhy
you justify your belief in MOQ is not faith with the claimthat it
falls asRATIONAL empiricism and thenwith this new statement shun
rational label as SOM and seemingly start to describe arealm of
beyondunderstanding whichwas how you described faith.
msh says:
You're confused because you are mixing up responses from two
different people. MSH is not MEL.
Mel thinks that rejecting SOM means rejecting rationalism, a position
so clearly refuted by a variety of contributors to this list that
it's hard to understand why he still clings to it.
Just take a little time to examine a posting and see who's saying
what, before responding. You also might want to consider labelling
sections of your posts with things like "mel said:" , "erin says:"
"msh says:" This will make it a lot easier for all of us to
determining who's saying what in response to whom.
Best,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
everything." -- Henri Poincare'
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 26 2004 - 04:52:19 BST