From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 13:24:32 BST
Hi Sam,
> Except that his answer to the question is 'biologically yes, socially no'
> (and dynamically she's off the scale). So there is still no locus for
> 'individual' *as such* - which reflects his Buddhist stance, and which is
> where you and I agree the MoQ needs amendment.
Would you agree that Pirsig's referring to himself as the "author" and
using the nom de plume of "Phaedrus" constitutes an individual locus? I
suspect it does, although I'm not sure what you mean by locus for
individual "as such."
Best,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 13:43:15 BST