From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 10:57:42 BST
Hi Platt,
> Pirsig's theme in Lila, "Does Lila have Quality?" belies the notion that
> he places little value on the individual as an individual. In fact, I've
> argued that the intellectual level should rightly be called the Individual
> Level as only individuals are capable of intellectual processes.
> (Societies don't think.) The contradiction I see, however, is Pirsig's
> apparent "faith" in the unreality of "self," based I presume on Buddhist
> faith in One Self in spite of our "experience" or observational evidence
> that we each are born and die separately. I sure don't perceive I inhabit
> someone else's skin :-)
Except that his answer to the question is 'biologically yes, socially no' (and dynamically she's off
the scale). So there is still no locus for 'individual' *as such* - which reflects his Buddhist
stance, and which is where you and I agree the MoQ needs amendment.
Regards
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 12:32:22 BST