From: Joseph Maurer (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri Dec 31 2004 - 18:49:39 GMT
On 31 December 2004 3:25 AM Ian writes to Paul:
[Ian] One thing I'm in sure agreement over is that anyone who thinks they
can
divorce reality from intellectual constructs (imagination) is doomed to a
sad, frustrating and tautological quest, (beyond the inherent interest of
pure though experiments.)
Hi Ian Paul and all,
The OOOOOW! of inorganic chaos accompanies me into the New Year!
I have no intellectual construct for a moral difference between inorganic,
organic, social and intellectual levels. They are not reality! I don't like
that conclusion. Is morality logic?
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: MD "Is there anything out there?"
> Paul, just picking up on one core point in here ...
>
> You said ..
> "Well, I would say it's intellect that constructs external reality. If you
> feel the need to divorce imagination from rationality then go ahead."
>
> ie "Intellect Constructs External Reality" you say.
> Before the pedants pick you up on the logic of that axiomatic statement,
> could I just unpick your intended meaning ?
> I see two extreme interpretations one of which I consider true, and one
> which I believe could possibly be shown to be true.
>
> (1)
> Intellect (as in the higher order mind functions of "intelligent beings"
> like humans, from which emerge the socio-intellectual patterns of
> behaviour)
> Constructs (as in creates the only useful interpretation of)
> External Rationality (the intellect can ever know, even if "external
> rationality" actually does exist "out there")
> This I agree with.
>
> (2)
> Intellect (as in some transcendant concept of consciousness)
> Constructs (as in the stuff all existence is made of, in some fundamental
> way)
> External Reality (which independantly really exists "out there").
> This I suspect could turn out to be true, and in fact the intellects of
> (1)
> and (2) may even interact, but since we may possibly only ever see it
> through interpretation (1) it might be forever irrelevant. (But I'm not
> sure. It is this "intellect" or super-consciousness which I see as prone
> to
> god-like metaphors, which are understandable, even useful, provided people
> don't then mis-athropomorphise them into some super-being with a mind with
> intent and purpose, etc, in order to explain the teleological reason "why"
> anything.)
>
> One thing I'm in sure agreement over is that anyone who thinks they can
> divorce reality from intellectual constructs (imagination) is doomed to a
> sad, frustrating and tautological quest, (beyond the inherent interest of
> pure though experiments.)
>
> Ian.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Turner" <paul@turnerbc.co.uk>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 5:02 PM
> Subject: RE: MD "Is there anything out there?"
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 31 2004 - 18:52:19 GMT