Re: MD Conflict

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Aug 16 2005 - 11:31:59 BST

  • Next message: Sam Norton: "Re: MD What is mainstream Christianity?"

    Hi Ian:

    > The main point - is about "combining" the best of both worlds,
    > aesthetic and logical postivist ...
    >
    > So far so good.. Clearly a central point in the MoQ space, but it
    > seems we have a difference in what "combining" means.
    >
    > You seem to suggest having them both in your toolbox is combining
    > them, so that you can apply the aesthetic to "art" and the logical
    > postive to apply objectively in "rational debate". Each remains a
    > distinct component in your combination ? You still have distinct
    > subjective and objective view points ?
    >
    > My view of combining them is as some fusion into a single tool, so
    > that "rational debate" benefits from more that logic. A higher
    > "quality" reasoning, that is neither objective nor subjective.
    >
    > You might think I'm hopelessly misguided in that view, but I'd still
    > be interested to know that you get the point I'm making. (As you know, I
    > prefer to synthesise than analyse and I'm looking for something to build
    > on.)

    I think we can both admire Pirsig for doing what you suggest in his two
    books -- rational argument benefiting from more than logic. I considered
    both ZMM and Lila to be works of art. Whether the same can be accomplished
    here in a discussion group is doubtful although at times there have been
    posts to the MD that approach the poetic (none I can point to offhand, but
    the impression remains). What concerns me about a rhetorical approach to
    rational debate is the substitution of rhetoric for thinking. Right now,
    for example, some people are in a swivet about "racial profiling" whereas
    a little common sense would lead one to believe that searching
    grandmother's pocketbook is not likely to catch a suicide bomber and save
    lives. So I prefer to follow Pirsig's advice in seeking truth -- agreement
    with experience, logical consistency, and economy of explanation.

    Platt
         

        

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 16 2005 - 12:15:39 BST