From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 18:05:02 BST
Hi Steve,
We still use "more moral" the same way though, because when you say
something is "more moral" you are presumably asserting that most people
would agree with you about what to choose, at least once you've had a chance
to explain your understanding of the situation, right? If you didn't care
about what most people thought, why bother getting anyone's sanction about
it being moral, why bother to make the assertion at all?
Johnny
>From: Steve Peterson <peterson.steve@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
>Subject: Re: MD Intellectual Art (Dynamic Morality)
>Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:11:54 -0500
>
>Hi Johnny,
>
> > It's just the definition of moral, that's all.
>
>It's your definition of moral, anyway. I'm glad you put it that way. I
>think I finally understand what you are saying.
>
>I think that when the rest of us on the list say that that some choice is
>more moral than something else, we mean it is better to make that choice.
>
>It will still be difficult to communicate with you, but at least now I know
>the key to translating your statements.
>
>Thanks,
>Steve
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 18:06:05 BST