From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:11:10 BST
To anyone who can help me clear up a glitch in my
understanding!
I'm currently re-reading Lila (now that I've started
posting to the forum) and there's something which is
giving me a feeling of intellectual indigestion.
I can't make the following statements stack up:
Lila is a cohesion of changing static patterns. There
isn’t any more to her than that. Ch 11
Lila is composed of static patterns of value and these
patterns are evolving toward a Dynamic Quality. Ch 11
Static patterns can’t by themselves perceive or adjust
to Dynamic Quality. Only a living being can do that.
Ch 13
The only conclusions I can reach are that:
a) Lila is not a living being
b) Living beings are not static patterns of value, in
which case they must be Dynamic Quality
c) Living beings are both static and Dynamic Quality
which means Lila is in some sense the source of all
things, and is evolving toward herself
I suspect there is something I'm completely missing
here.
Thanks in advance
Paul
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:12:05 BST