From: phyllis bergiel (neilfl@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:49:51 BST
Hi Wim, Sam et al
I won't repeat all the previous posts on this one; I would just like to
suggest that perhaps a return to some of the "traditional" explanators of
religion do offer a clear insight to the attraction of religion (esp. the
anthropomorphization of spiritual beings) and yes, I can't remember who said
it, but it does seem to reinforce the idea of religion being determined. I
am referring to Marx and Freud here.
Especially Freud on God as Father.
The question that this leads me to ask is that if a person acts according to
this psychological need, then, is this a biological static pattern. If they
rebel, the social level (at least the social level of a certain time and
today of place, still calls them delusional) My question is then, are
psychological explanators biological, social or intellectual patterns?
Probably best if this gets a new thread, if anyone is interested in
following up.
Phyllis
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:46:01 BST