From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 12:41:24 BST
I personally think that your inside/outside
distinction is a good one to bear in mind when
considering how the MoQ emerges from the Quality
insight described in ZMM. I don't think you should
drop it, if you see it as a philosophological
distinction rather than a metaphysical one.
sq: If Steve wishes to do philosophology then agreement. I had Steve's
development in view, which may be non of my business? Come to think of it, it
certainly is NOT my business. Apologies Steve.
After adjusting to the view that patterns flow through each other, moving
back to the digital view is disconcerting.
The cavalry has arrived...
squonk
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 12:42:24 BST