From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sat Aug 02 2003 - 20:18:54 BST
Hi Squonk,
I said:
> Would you agree that the MOQ replaces separate subjective and objective
> realities that the SOMist must constantly shift between with a single
> reality that incorporates the two as on a continuum of experience that is
> entirely consistent with the experience of others to experience that is not
> at all consistent with the experience of others?
You said:
> After reading Lila upon its publication i began to drop my culturally
> inherited division of experience into subjects and objects. For me, experience
> is a process.
Could you (or anyone) explain what the 'division of experience into subjects
and objects' means. Are you talking about differentiating the one that
experiences from that which is experienced or dividing an experience into
experience of subjects from experience of objects?
I'm trying to nail down what SOM is. Do you think that mind-substance
metaphysics would be another name for the same thing?
>To address it directly, i would
> argue that the MoQ does not replace that which you describe, rather, it
> reinstates experience as primary reality.
I didn't mean for it to be a replacement, just perhaps a useful translation
of one to the other.
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 02 2003 - 20:17:42 BST